2010 husaberg 390 or 450 fe ?

 Εδω εχουμε ενα θεμα......ταχύτατος ή παιχνίδι? 

 Η αγορά τον 250 και 450 cc εχει αλλάξει.....αλλά κάπου εκει ενδιάμεσα ειναι το μέλλον!Προσωπικά νομηζω οτι εαν θελεις να κανεις το championi  πας για το 450 μιας και  έχει την δύναμη να κάνει τους καλύτερους χρόνους.....ειχα διαβάσει παλιότερα σε ενα άρθρο που δοκιμαζόταν το 390 -450-570

σε 2 γυρους .....με αποτέλεσμα 

1ο το 450 να κάνει και τους 2 γύρους καλύτερα αλλά με πιο επικίνδυνη οδήγηση!

2ο το 390 με πιο απλή και ευχάριστη οδήγηση  και ελαχιστη διαφορα απο το 450 !

  Παρακατω θα επισυνάψω κάποιες συζητήσεις που εχω βρει απο το νετ και από διάφορα forum

"The 390 would have the edge in a competition where you were riding all day and the terrain was technical, but both the 450 and the 570 are similar enough to be a good bike in the same terrain - especially if you use the map switch to tune the bike to your advantage. Now granted, you aren't going to turn a 570 into a 390 with that switch - it isn't magic, but it does make a difference. I use the soft setting on trails and the 'aggressive' setting on the roads to/from the trails. I mostly notice the difference on the trails - the difference seems to be mostly in how immediate the power is delivered, but also somewhat the amount. For example, on small section I like to warm up on has a small tree across the trail where I need to lift the front wheel over it - with the 'soft' setting I get a one foot wheelie, with the 'aggressive' setting I get a full on three to four foot wheelie. It is kind of too bad that the switch doesn't work without shutting down the engine because I can imagine that racers would love to have both responses on tap. Either way the power is still there; I can still pull third gear wheelies, but they are more subdued and less surprising when on the 'soft' setting.

So, the people I have talked to have said that there is of course a noticeable difference in power, and some in handling, but that these differences would only be an advantage for those who compete at one level or another, otherwise they prefer to have the power of the 450 or even the 570."

"  I rode them all and purchased the 450 Sounds like the 450 would be better for you"

 

"I have ridden all three and owned the 570 and 450. The 450 motor is my favorite, 

I just felt the 390 was a little too soft on the power and the 450 was more to my liking."

  "I sold my '07 TE450, in order to purchase a '10 FE390. I ride in New England woods, so it's common for me to encounter 1st & 2nd gear stuff. My (bone stock) 390 can feel a bit soft at times, compared to the more immediate pull of a 450. But if you are a faster rider, you likely won't be in that fluffy region of the power much. Riding it a faster pace, it's kinda like a porky, 250 smoker -- handles a bit similarly, and it runs well in the middle of the powerband, but it's got so much more traction. In some of the slower stuff (2nd-3rd gear, hills), it can feel a bit "gappy." The bike's EFI allows it to pull cleanly from almost any RPM at slower speeds, but when grabbing another gear it can fall off the pipe a bit of you're not well into the mid/upper RPM range. I'll likely be replacing the 52t with a 53t to close up the ratios some. The bike's power is nearly perfect, and I don't need the pull of a 450 (most of the time). The engine is remarkably smooth (I've got a street plate on mine), and the bike just about refuses to stall. Quite a difference from the ol' Husky. No more flame-outs in rock gardens! There are times I do miss the added thrust of the larger engine, but not very often. And the smaller engine has made the gnarly stuff fun, where it was a bitch to ride on the Husky."

"Never mind

I bought a 2010 450!
I love it. It turns better than my KTM 300 did.
Just putting around right now to break it in.
Thanks for all the tips and the useful website"

 

                                      χχμμμ,,,,,βασικά και τα δυο Γ#Μ&%*! 

                    αφήστε και εσείς τα σχόλια σας και τι μηχανάκι έχετε !!!